Discussion:
in x = x0 + v t you must have assumed v0 t0 = 0
(too old to reply)
Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
2009-12-03 16:02:29 UTC
Permalink
and if so x = x0 + v t + v0 t0 breaks down to [x = v t]_{by any
index}. you were saying Galileo's and Einstein's relativity? well come
again please but skip Newton's ill differential mechanics! after all
in the beginning x cannot be function that depends only on time (say x
= 1 + 2 t + 3 t t; the adders left are not even addable among them
self) so in the end you can claim x = x0 + v0 t + a t t / 2 = function
(x0, v0, a, t). if some magnitude becomes constant it doesn't prevent
the function to continue depending on its unique units. try plotting x
= v t in wolfram's matematica:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Plot[v+t%2C+{v%2C+-4%2C+%2B4}%2C+{t%2C+-4%2C+%2B4}]

lesson: no more shitty kinetics right? find your self another way of
doing physics...
M Purcell
2009-12-03 17:25:26 UTC
Permalink
On Dec 3, 8:02 am, Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
Post by Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi
and if so x = x0 + v t + v0 t0 breaks down to [x = v t]_{by any
index}. you were saying Galileo's and Einstein's relativity? well come
again please but skip Newton's ill differential mechanics! after all
in the beginning x cannot be function that depends only on time (say x
= 1 + 2 t + 3 t t; the adders left are not even addable among them
self) so in the end you can claim x = x0 + v0 t + a t t / 2 = function
(x0, v0, a, t). if some magnitude becomes constant it doesn't prevent
the function to continue depending on its unique units. try plotting x
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Plot[v+t%2C+{v%2C+-4%2C+%2B4}%2C+{t%2C+-4%2C+%2B4}]
lesson: no more shitty kinetics right? find your self another way of
doing physics...
Reminds me of Donald Shead's curvilinear analaysis, I wonder what
happened to him, maybe he tried to test it. Uncle Al might know, he
was pretty close.

Loading...