j***@portll.net
2013-09-09 16:41:37 UTC
A little harsh as a critique for an artist whose drip paintings retail in the region of $2000-5000 (more for larger canvasses such as Manhattan Winter, which sold for $8000), and who while admittedly not of quite the technical brilliance of Jackson Pollock, can at least be mentioned in the same breath as one of the pre-eminent drip painters of our time. She takes time to build scenes without the random factor overwhelming the painting's underlying concepts, so whether in works like Beyond the Web or in better known and less abstract works such as her oil on canvas 'Deep Blue Sea' or 'Red' series, the main thrust of the painting should be something even a non-art lover such as yourself could recognise without the title cards attached.
Lastly, the fact that she is elderly (possibly even deceased by now) should not be relevant to the discussion - either she is an artist of merit or not. Let us agree to diverge on the subject.
Lastly, the fact that she is elderly (possibly even deceased by now) should not be relevant to the discussion - either she is an artist of merit or not. Let us agree to diverge on the subject.
I have never called randomize blotches of paint with titles art. They can
look nice as a decor or maybe even considered a craft, but it is not art!
Art implies the application of a skill, not randomness. I hate to be the
one to be negative toward an elderly person, but let's get some perspective
here.
Ron
look nice as a decor or maybe even considered a craft, but it is not art!
Art implies the application of a skill, not randomness. I hate to be the
one to be negative toward an elderly person, but let's get some perspective
here.
Ron